Critics and media demand uniqueness and practicality in all Srk
movies. It feels now as if they do it deliberately to prove that his movies are
no more good. Consequently, it is too easy to predict what review or news they will
write about them. Today, we bring you some of them. in fact, we will show you
what they will say about Chennai Express:
Music album review:
"Vishal Shekhar did not do a good. Their
songs were too ordinary."
They will completely ignore the fact that this album
has been praised by majority of the listeners as awesome and unique. If you
wish to see the proof go to Chennai Express juke box available at youtube.
Movie review:
Expect these lines to come out of their small
hearts
“there is one scene taken from xyz movie”
“ Deepika’s accent is artificial”
"Deepika is annoying"
"Deepika is annoying"
“Srk still looks older than his costar”
“the punch lines could have been better”
“the film has no one from Bollywood and that’s a
disappointment”
“there is weakness in the story”
“its another boy meet girl movie”
“we have already seen this in other masala films”
“songs weren’t choreographed properly”
“Srk should stick to sophisticated films and not try masala
ever again”
"train sequence is slow boring"
"train sequence is slow boring"
After the release of the movie
They will write the
following:
“Public reviews are mixed”
“looks like only single screen movie goers liked the film”
However, they will give good reviews of Once upon time in Mumbai
in such a way as if no one ever made a movie on Dawood Ibrahim ever. Expect this to come at least from Raja Sen who
thinks Kaminey is one of the best movies ever made. Also they will go around
saying that Once Upon a time is doing tremendous business globally. But funny
thing is that it is not possible because just like the last one it will contain
under world jargons and majority of us who live outside India do not understand
them at all. Majority of my NRI friends are still trying to figure out what issue
exactly caused Emran and Ajay to become enemy of each other in part one of the
movie. The problem was in the language. It was not in pure hindi for which the movie
left many NRI’s scratching their heads.
Critics are biased. Just think about Himmatwala. We don't know how it is, but most critics gave it very bad review. Many in the media said it was a revenge against Sajid because he was rude with them. Just google it. Bottom line is that its too stupid to take Indian critics seriously.
They pass other movies with flying colors despite the fact the contents inside them are not original. They still call them unique! We will show you some examples.
Lootera: Thats old wine in new bottle. Just by watching the trailer you will be able to tell that it is 90 percent remake of Fanaa of Aamir Khan. Obviously, the end has to be different. Instead of Sonakshi, cops kill her lover. The year is 1953 or something, Sonakshi wears saree, the surrounding is darker and dialogue is replaced by silence. In the media, there are wannabe intellectuals who think that enjoying such stuff will make them look "cool" in front of their peers (very middle schoolish). Many of them are critics. These retards called Lootera "poetry". But the funny thing is that the audiences who were supposed to be most excited about this movie rejected it. In West Bengal, it is a big flop. Now the question is, why critics didn't write in their reviews of this movie that it is similar to Fanaa?
During Main Hoon Na's time, they stretched again and again that a small portion of the movie looked like the case shown in Masoom. Then they found My Name is Khan to be a copy of Forrest Gump. When they wrote about Ra One they found elements of Tron in it. Both the movies were supervised by the same Hollywood guy. The critics simply chose to hide it. They, then went onto writing that there was problem in the script, but never really showed any examples. When Don 2 came, they saw Mission Impossible in it. How come they don't say how other Indian movies always show the same story again and again?
Fukurey: Some losers fall in trouble because of money and gang! Wow, we never watched this ever, right critics?
Bhaag Mika Bhag: Wannabe intellectuals are brainwashed by the fallacy that any movie based on a celebrity's personal struggle is Oscar and National award worthy! That is why, some of the Indian critics are hyping Bhag Mika Bhag.
This post can go on and on. But we have less time in hand. We leave you with everything summed up as shown below.
They pass other movies with flying colors despite the fact the contents inside them are not original. They still call them unique! We will show you some examples.
Lootera: Thats old wine in new bottle. Just by watching the trailer you will be able to tell that it is 90 percent remake of Fanaa of Aamir Khan. Obviously, the end has to be different. Instead of Sonakshi, cops kill her lover. The year is 1953 or something, Sonakshi wears saree, the surrounding is darker and dialogue is replaced by silence. In the media, there are wannabe intellectuals who think that enjoying such stuff will make them look "cool" in front of their peers (very middle schoolish). Many of them are critics. These retards called Lootera "poetry". But the funny thing is that the audiences who were supposed to be most excited about this movie rejected it. In West Bengal, it is a big flop. Now the question is, why critics didn't write in their reviews of this movie that it is similar to Fanaa?
During Main Hoon Na's time, they stretched again and again that a small portion of the movie looked like the case shown in Masoom. Then they found My Name is Khan to be a copy of Forrest Gump. When they wrote about Ra One they found elements of Tron in it. Both the movies were supervised by the same Hollywood guy. The critics simply chose to hide it. They, then went onto writing that there was problem in the script, but never really showed any examples. When Don 2 came, they saw Mission Impossible in it. How come they don't say how other Indian movies always show the same story again and again?
Fukurey: Some losers fall in trouble because of money and gang! Wow, we never watched this ever, right critics?
Bhaag Mika Bhag: Wannabe intellectuals are brainwashed by the fallacy that any movie based on a celebrity's personal struggle is Oscar and National award worthy! That is why, some of the Indian critics are hyping Bhag Mika Bhag.
This post can go on and on. But we have less time in hand. We leave you with everything summed up as shown below.
